Comparative efficacy of filling materials and stainless-steel pediatric crowns for primary molars restoration
https://doi.org/10.25636/PMP.3.2018.4.8
Abstract
The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy of various dental fillings materials and stainless steel pediatric crowns (SSC) for primary molars restoration and to reveals failure associated factors. The prospective study involved 156 children with 636 primary molars treated both “in chair”, under conscious sedation or general anesthesia (GA). Analyzed failure risk factors included diagnosis, cavity class, use of rubber dam and treatment conditions. GIC showed lowest overall efficacy at 4-years follow-up (66,1%) while SSC were the most effective (93,0) regardless of GA use. Composite resin failure rate corresponded strongly with GA use (90% success under GA vs less than 70% in no GA-group). Compomers showed the same although less evident correlation (70,7%, 78,5% and 84,6% success rate in compliant, conscious sedation and GA groups, correspondently). Rubber dam use showed no significant influence on overall complications rate but changed the complications structure. Thus, composite resins are much more feasible in GA procedures while SCC proved to be universally effective primary molars restoration method.
About the Authors
М. Короленкова
Отделение госпитальной детской терапевтической стоматологии ЦНИИС и ЧЛХ
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
А. Арзуманян
Отдел детской челюстно-лицевой хирургии и стоматологии ЦНИИС и ЧЛХ
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Короленкова М. В., Арзуманян А. П., Васильев А. В. Герметизм пломб и педиатрических коронок при восстановлении временных моляров после пульпотомии // Стоматология детского возраста и профилактика. 2018. Т. 17. №2 (65). С. 45-48.
2. Федотов К. И., Русанов Ф. С., Мандра Ю. В., Кисельникова Л. П. Анализ прочности адгезионной связи различных пломбировочных материалов к твердым тканям временных зубов // Стоматология детского возраста и профилактика. 2017. Т. 16. №1 (60). С. 16-19.
3. Andersson-Wenckert I. E., Folkesson U. H., van Dijken J. W. Durability of a polyacidmodifi ed composite resin (compomer) in primary molars. A multicenter study // Acta Odontol Scand. 1997. Aug. №55 (4). Р. 255-260.
4. Attin T., Opatowski A., Meyer C., ZinggMeyer B., Buchalla W., Mönting J. S. Three-year follow up assessment of Class II restorations in primary molars with a polyacid-modifi ed composite resin and a hybrid composite // Am J Dent. 2001. Jun. №14 (3). Р. 148-152.
5. Bücher K., Metz I., Pitchika V., Hickel R., Kühnisch J. Survival characteristics of composite restorations in primary teeth // Clin Oral Investig. 2015. Sep. №19 (7). Р. 1653-1662. – doi: 10.1007/s00784-014-1389-9.
6. Cenci M. S., Tenuta L. M., Pereira-Cenci T., Del Bel Cury A. A., ten Cate J. M., Cury J. A. Effect of microleakage and fl uoride on enameldentine demineralization around restorations // Caries Res. 2008. №42 (5). Р. 369-379. – doi: 10.1159/000151663.
7. Chisini L. A., Collares K., Cademartori M. G., Oliveira de L. J. C., Conde M. C. M., Demarco F. F., Corrêa M. B. Restorations in primary teeth: a systematic review on survival and reasons for failures // Int J Paediatr Dent. 2018. Mar. №28 (2). Р. 123-139. – doi: 10.1111/ipd.12346.
8. Cury J. A., Oliveira de B. H., Santos dos A. P., Tenuta L. M. Are fl uoride releasing dental materials clinically effective on caries control? // Dent Mater. 2016. Mar. №32 (3). Р. 323-333. – doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.12.002.
9. Demarco F. F., Collares K., Coelho-deSouza F. H., Correa M. B., Cenci M. S., Moraes R. R., Opdam N. J. Anterior composite restorations: A systematic review on long-term survival and reasons for failure // Dent Mater. 2015. Oct. №31 (10). Р. 1214-1224. – doi: 10.1016/j. dental.2015.07.005.
10. Demarco F. F., Corrêa M. B., Cenci M. S., Moraes R. R., Opdam N. J. Longevity of posterior composite restorations: not only a matter of materials // Dent Mater. 2012. Jan. №28 (1). Р. 87-101. – doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2011.09.003.
11. Duggal M. S., Toumba K. J., Sharma N. K. Clinical performance of a compomer and amalgam for the interproximal restoration of primarymolars: a 24-month evaluation // Br Dent J. 2002. Sep. №28. 193 (6). Р. 339-342.
12. Franzon R., Opdam N. J., Guimarães L. F., Demarco F. F., Casagrande L., Haas A. N., Araujo F. B. Randomized controlled clinical trial of the 24-months survival of composite resin restorations after one-step incomplete and complete excavation on primary teeth // J Dent. 2015. Oct. №43 (10). Р. 1235-1241. – doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.07.011.
13. Gross L. C., Griffen A. L., Casamassimo P. S. Compomers as Class II restorations in primary molars // Pediatr Dent. 2001. Jan-Feb. №23 (1). Р. 24-27.
14. Kassebaum N. J., Bernabé E., Dahiya M., Bhandari B., Murray C. J., Marcenes W. Global burden of untreated caries: a systematic review and metaregression // J Dent Res. 2015. May. №94 (5). Р. 650-658. – doi: 10.1177/0022034515573272.
15. Kavvadia K., Kakaboura A., Vanderas A. P., Papagiannoulis L. Clinical evaluation of a compomer and an amalgam primary teeth class II restorations: a 2-year comparative study // Pediatr Dent. 2004. May-Jun. №26 (3). Р. 245-50.
16. Kitty M. Y., Wei S. H. Y. Clinical evaluation of compomer in primary teeth: 1 year result // J Am Dent Assoc. 1997. №128. Р. 1088-1096.
17. Krämer N., Frankenberger R. Compomers in restorative therapy of children: a literature review // Int J Paediatr Dent. 2007. Jan. №17 (1). Р. 2-9.
18. Laske M., Opdam N. J., Bronkhorst E. M., Braspenning J. C., Huysmans M. C. Longevity of direct restorations in Dutch dental practices. Descriptive study out of a practice based research network // J Dent. 2016. Mar. №46. Р. 12-17. – doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2016.01.002.
19. Leith R., O’Connell A. C. A clinical study evaluating success of 2 commercially available preveneered primary molar stainless steel crowns // Pediatr Dent. 2011. Jul-Aug. №33 (4). Р. 300-306.
20. Opdam N. J., Sande van de F. H., Bronkhorst E., Cenci M. S., Bottenberg P., Pallesen U., Gaengler P., Lindberg A., Huysmans M. C., Dijken van J. W. Longevity of posterior composite restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis // J Dent Res. 2014. Oct. №93 (10). Р. 943-949. – doi: 10.1177/0022034514544217.
21. Pinto Gdos S., Oliveira L. J., Romano A. R., Schardosim L. R., Bonow M. L., Pacce M., Correa M. B., Demarco F. F., Torriani D. D. Longevity of posterior restorations in primary teeth: results from a paediatric dental clinic // J Dent. 2014.
22. Oct. №42 (10). Р. 1248-1254. – doi: 10.1016/j. jdent.2014.08.005.
23. Raggio P. D., Tedesco T. K., Calvo A. F., Braga M. M. Do glass ionomer cements prevent caries lesions in margins of restorations in primary teeth? A systematic review and meta-analysis // J Am Dent Assoc. 2016. №147. Р. 177-185.
24. Roberts J. F., Attari N., Sherriff M. The survival of resin modifi ed glass ionomer and stainless steel crown restorations in primarymolars, placed in a specialist paediatric dental practice // Br Dent J. 2005. Apr. №9. 198 (7). Р. 427-431.
25. Schüler I. M., Hiller M., Roloff T., Kühnisch J., Heinrich-Weltzien R. Clinical success of stainless steel crowns placed under general anaesthesia in primary molars: an observational follow up study // J Dent. 2014. Nov. №42 (11). Р. 1396-1403. – doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.06.00.
26. Soncini J. A., Maserejian N. N., Trachtenberg F., Tavares M., Hayes C. The longevity of amalgam versus compomer/ composite restorations in posterior primary and permanent teeth: fi ndings From the New England Children’s Amalgam Trial // J Am Dent Assoc. 2007. Jun. №138 (6). Р. 763-772.
27. Sande van de F. H., Collares K., Correa M. B., Cenci M. S., Demarco F. F., Opdam N. Restoration Survival: revisiting patients’ risk factors through a systematic literature review // Oper Dent. 2016. Sep. №41 (S7). S7-S26.
28. Yengopal V., Mickenautsch S. Cariespreventive effect of resin-modifi ed glassionomer cement (RM-GIC) versus composite resin: a quantitative systematic review // Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2011. Feb. №12 (1). Р. 5-14
Review
For citations:
, Comparative efficacy of filling materials and stainless-steel pediatric crowns for primary molars restoration. Pediatric dentistry and dental prophylaxis. 2018;18(4):41-46. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25636/PMP.3.2018.4.8
Views:
520
Email this article 
