MI early care
Abstract
New diagnostic tools for caries lesion detection, caries risk assessment and focused preventive treatments have decreased the need for aggressive intervention.
References
1. AAPD Guideline on caries risk-assessment and management for infants, children, and adolescents // Pediatr Dent. 2011. №33. Р. 110-117.
2. AAPD 2013 Guideline on periodicity of examination, preventive dental services, anticipatory guidance/counseling, and oral treatment for infants, children, and adolescents. - www.aapd.org/media/policies_guidelines/g_periodicity.pdf.
3. AAPD 2014 Guideline on caries-risk assessment and management for infants, children, and adolescents. - www.aapd.org/media/policies_guidelines/g_ cariesriskassessment. pdf.
4. Ahovuo-Saloranta A., Forss H., Walsh T. et al. Sealants for preventing dental decay in the permanent teeth // Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013. №3. CD001830.
5. Ahovuo-Saloranta A., Forss H., Hiiri A., Nordblad A., Makela M. Pit and fissure sealants versus fl uoride varnishes for preventing dental decay in the permanent teeth of children and adolescents // Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. №1. CD003067.
6. Albino J., Tiwari T. Preventing childhood caries: a review of recent behavioral research // J Dent Res. 2016. №95. Р. 35-42.
7. Antonson S. A., Antonson D. E., Brener S. et al. Twentyfour month clinical evaluation of fi ssure sealants on partially erupted permanent first molars: glass ionomer versus resin-based sealant // J Am Dent Assoc. 2012. №143. Р. 115-122.
8. Arrow P. Incidence and progression of approximal carious lesions among schoolchildren in Western Australia // Aust Dent J. 2007. №52. Р. 216-226.
9. Barton M. K. Evidence accumulates indicating periodontal disease as a risk factor for colorectal cancer or lymphoma // CA Cancer J Clin. 2017. - doi: 10.3322/caac.21367.
10. CDC. Recommendations for using fl uoride to prevent and control dental caries in the United States // MMWR Recomm Rep. 2001. №50 (RR-14). Р. 1-42.
11. Chen F., Wang D. Novel technologies for the prevention and treatment of dental caries: a patent survey // Expert Opin Ther Pat. 2010. №20. Р. 681-694.
12. Colon P., Lussi A. Minimal intervention dentistry: part 5. Ultra-conservative approach to the treatment of erosive and abrasive lesions // Br Dent J. 2014. №216. Р. 463-468.
13. Davenport C. F., Elley K. M., Fry-Smith A., Taylor-Weetman C. L., Taylor R. S. The effectiveness of routine dental checks: a systematic review of the evidence base // Br Dent J. 2003. №195. Р. 87-98.
14. Doens D., Fernández P. L. Microglia receptors and their implications in the response to amyloid for Alzheimer’s disease pathogenesis // J Neuroinfl ammation. 2014. №11. Р. 48.
15. Featherstone J. D., Doméjean S. The role of remineralizing and anticaries agents in caries management // Adv Dent Res. 2012. №24. Р. 28-31.
16. Frencken J. E., van’t Hof M. A., Taifour D., Al-Zaher I. Effectiveness of ART and traditional amalgam approach in restoring singlesurface cavities in posterior teeth of permanent dentitions in schoolchildren after 6.3 years // Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2007. №35. Р. 207-214.
17. Gupta R., Prakash V. CPP-ACP complex as a new adjunctive agent for remineralisation: a review // Oral Health Prev Dent. 2011. №9. Р. 151-165.
Review
For citations:
MI early care. Pediatric dentistry and dental prophylaxis. 2017;16(3):21-25. (In Russ.)
Views:
338
Email this article 
