Alveolar cleft bone grafting at different age periods
S. V. Yakovlev,
O. Z. Topolnitsky,
M. A. Pershina,
Yu. A. Shonicheva,
A. P. Gurgenadze,
A. V. Makeev,
A. A. Beglaryan,
T. A. Bakshi https://doi.org/10.33925/1683-3031-2022-22-3-162-169
Abstract
Relevance. Anatomical and functional disorders in congenital clefts may be various. Their severity depends on the cleft size and on the combination of a cleft lip with an alveolar cleft. Alveolar cleft bone grafting (ACBG) is one of the most important surgeries for patients with cleft lip and palate rehabilitation. The study aimed to analyze the results of alveolar cleft bone grafting in various age groups, summarizing the available data and supplementing them with our own experience.
Materials and methods. In our clinic, 488 patients of different ages (from 4 to 18 years old), including patients with bilateral clefts, underwent ACBG.
Results. The result analysis showed the time of surgery should depend not on the child's age but on the orthodontic preparation of the child for ACBG.
Conclusion. The literature data and our experience allowed us to develop indications for ACBG at different ages
About the Authors
S. V. Yakovlev
A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Sergey V. Yakovlev, DDS, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Pediatric Maxillofacial Surgery
Moscow
O. Z. Topolnitsky
A. I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Orest Z. Topolnitsky, DDS, PhD, DSc, Professor, Head of the Department of Pediatric Maxillofacial Surgery
Moscow
M. A. Pershina
A. I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Marina A. Pershina, DDS, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Pediatric Maxillofacial Surgery
Moscow
Yu. A. Shonicheva
A. I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Yulia A. Shonicheva, DMD, PhD, Orthodontist, Department of Orthodontics
Moscow
A. P. Gurgenadze
A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Anna P. Gurgenadze, DDS, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Pediatric Maxillofacial Surgery
Moscow
A. V. Makeev
A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Artem V. Makeev, DDS, PhD, Assistant Professor, Department of Pediatric Maxillofacial Surgery
Moscow
A. A. Beglaryan
A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alina A. Beglaryan, DDS, 2nd-year clinical resident, Department of Pediatric Maxillofacial Surgery
Moscow
T. A. Bakshi
A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Tatiana A. Bakshi, DDS, 2nd-year clinical resident, Department of Pediatric Maxillofacial Surgery
Moscow
References
1. Makeev AV, Topolnitsky OZ, Fedotov RN. The use of various types of autografts in the bone grafting of the alveolar process. RUDN Journal of Medicine. 2020;24(1):69-74 (In Russ.). doi: 10.22363/2313-0245-2020-24-1-69-74
2. Russell K, Long RE Jr, Daskalogiannakis J, et al. A Multicenter Study Using the SWAG Scale to Compare Secondary Alveolar Bone Graft Outcomes for Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2016;53(2):180-186. doi: 10.1597/14-215
3. Sharif F, Ur Rehman I, Muhammad N, MacNeil S. Dental materials for cleft palate repair. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2016;61:1018-1028. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2015.12.019
4. Fudalej P, Janiszewska-Olszowska J, Wedrychowska-Szulc B, Katsaros C. Early alveolar bone grafting has a negative effect on maxillary dental arch dimensions of pre-school children with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2011;14(2):51-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-6343.2011.01507.x
5. Larsen PE. Reconstruction of the alveolar cleft. In: Miloro M, Ghali GE, Larsen PE, Waite PD, editors. Peterson's Principles of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2nd ed. Hamilton, London: BC Decker Inc; 2004. pp. 859–870. doi: 10.1016/S0377-1237(06)80173-5
6. Nauth A, Lane J, Watson JT, Giannoudis P. Bone Graft Substitution and Augmentation. J Orthop Trauma. 2015;29 Suppl 12:S34-S38. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000464
7. Davydov BN, Bessonov SN. Treatment of bilateral cleft lip. Stomatologiya. 2013;92(2):60 64 (In Russ.). Available from: https://www.mediasphera.ru/issues/stomatologiya/2013/2/030039-17352013217
8. Gileva KS, Chkadua TZ, Romanov EM, Butsan SB, Mokhirev MA, Iigitaliev ShN, et al. Use of the vascularized femur periosteal corticocancellous autotransplant in the reconstruction of the maxillary alveolar ridge in patients with the congenital cleft lip and palate. Annals of plastic, reconstructive and aesthetic surgery. 2018;1:10- 20 (In Russ.). Available from: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=34861461
9. Ivanov AL, Reshetnjak EI, Starikova NV, Udalova NV, Nadtochiy AG. Resorbable vs nonresorbable fixation in alveolar bone grafting in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients. Stomatologiya. 2018;97(1):40 46 (In Russ.). doi: 10.17116/stomat201897140-46
10.
Review
For citations:
Yakovlev S.V., Topolnitsky O.Z., Pershina M.A., Shonicheva Yu.A., Gurgenadze A.P., Makeev A.V., Beglaryan A.A., Bakshi T.A. Alveolar cleft bone grafting at different age periods. Pediatric dentistry and dental prophylaxis. 2022;22(3):162-169. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33925/1683-3031-2022-22-3-162-169
Views:
1131
Email this article 
