Preview

Pediatric dentistry and dental prophylaxis

Advanced search

Evaluation of the preventive care effectiveness in the adults with odontogenic infection given social and hygienic risk factors

https://doi.org/10.33925/1683-3031-2021-21-3-175-181

Abstract

Relevance. Odontogenic infection is one of the most important problems of dental science. The variety of anti-inflammatory oral hygiene products determines the need for targeted selection of preventive toothpastes and rinses, balms, foams, elixirs, as well as monitoring and training the algorithm of hygienic measures for a patient with an odontogenic infection. The aim of the study was to study the hygienic status of the adult population for the selection of individual oral hygiene products for odontogenic infection, taking into account social and hygienic factors.

Materials and methods. The study examined the prevalence of odontogenic infection in the adult population to determine the need for professional care and dental education. The study involved 198 people without somatic pathology, who were allocated into four groups according to the performed oral care and taking into account the dental status and the intensity of oral microbiota formation in the adult population. The patients were followed-up every week for one month. The study examined the simplified oral hygiene index by GreenVermillion (OHI-S), PMA index and Mühlemann and Son sulcus bleeding index, which allowed calculating the effectiveness of oral care products.

Results. The preventive care effectiveness evaluation showed an increase in the cleansing effect in the adult population over the entire study period. The anti-inflammatory effectiveness analysis demonstrated positive changes: by the end of the study, the PMA index was 51.52 ± 3.40% in group 1; it increased by a factor of 3 and amounted to 44.17 ± 2.77% in group 2; 56.51 ± 4.61% – in group 3, 48.95 ± 3.60% – in group 4. The Mühlemann and Son sulcus bleeding index demonstrated the changes in the periodontal tissue condition and amounted to 52.78 ± 3.62% in group 1, 44.11 ± 3.54% in group 2, 54.97 ± 3.98% in group 3, 47.78 ± 2.73% in group 4.

Conclusions. The development of oral health promotion measures determines the significance of oral care products for the prevention of odontogenic infection in the adult population, which plays a crucial role in the individual program planning for the main dental disease prevention.

About the Authors

S. B. Ulitovskiy
Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University
Russian Federation

Sergej B. Ulitovskiy, DMD, PhD DSc, Professor, Chief of the Department of Preventive Dentistry, Deputy Director for Research of the Research Institute of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery

Saint Petersburg



O. V. Kalinina
Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University
Russian Federation

Olga V. Kalinina, DMD, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Preventive Dentistry, Senior Researcher, Research Institute of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery

Saint Petersburg



A. V. Shevcov
Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University
Russian Federation

Aleksandr V. Shevtsov, DMD, Assistant Professor, Department of Preventive Dentistry

Saint Petersburg



E. S. Soloveva
Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University
Russian Federation

Elena S. Soloveva, Assistant Professor, Department of Preventive Dentistry

Saint Petersburg



N. K. Fok
Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University
Russian Federation

Natalia K. Fok, Senior Department Assistant, Department of Preventive Dentistry

Saint Petersburg



References

1. Ulitovskiy SB, Vasyanina AA, Kalinina OV, Alekseeva ES, Leontiev AA, Pankratieva LI, et al. Study of the dynamics of hygienic, periodontal and dental status in different population groups. The Scientific Notes of the Pavlov University. 2019;26(4):49-55 (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24884/1607-4181-2019-26-4-49-55

2. Polozhentseva AI, Shirinsky VA Influence of ecological-hygienic and socialdemographic factors on population dental diseases incidence. Human Ecology. 2012;6:48-53 (In Russ.). Available from: https://hum-ecol.ru/1728-0869/article/view/17467

3. Ulitovskiy SB, Alekseeva ES, Leontiev AA, Shevtsov AV. Factors affecting dental status of adolescents undergoing orthodontic treatment with bracket systems. Pediatric dentistry and dental profilaxis. 2020;20(2):143-149 (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33925/1683-3031-2020-20-2-143-149

4. Kudryavtseva TV, Tachalov VV, Loboda ES, Orekhova LYu, Nechai EYu, Shalamay LI. Surveying adherence of dental clinic patients to preventive measures in oral cavity. Parodontologiya. 2019;24(2):167-172 (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33925/1683-3759-2019-24-2-167-172

5. Suvirina MB, Ushnitsky ID, Yurkevich AV, Kobets AR, Ivanova AA, Ivanov AV. Frequency and structure of pathological processes of periodontal tissues in the population of the Far Eastern region. Yakut medical journal. 2018;3:71- 74 (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25789/YMJ.2018.63.24

6. Leontyeva EYu, Bykovskaya TYu. The combination of oral pathology evaluation. Stomatology for All. Int. Dental Review. 2020;91(2):56-59 (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35556/idr-2020-2(91)56-59

7. Pinelis IS, Pinelis YuI, Malezhik MS, Ushnitsky ID. Congenital and adaptive immunity indicators in chronic generalized periodontitis in elderly and senile patients. Yakut medical journal. 2020;1:63-68 (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25789/YMJ.2020.69.15

8. Arweiler NB, Auschill TM, Sculean A. Patient selfcare of periodontal pocket infections. Periodontol 2000. 2018;76(1):164-179 https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12152

9. Garyga V, Pochelu F, Thivichon-Prince B, Aouini W, Santamaria J, Lambert F, Maucort-Boulch D, Gueyffier F, Gritsch K, Grosgogeat B. GoPerio – impact of a personalized video and an automated two-way text-messaging system in oral hygiene motivation: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2019;20(1):699 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3738-0

10. Freeman, R. Strategies for motivating the non-compliant patient. Br Dent J.187;1999:307-312 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4800266

11. Woelber JP, Spann-Aloge N, Hanna G, Fabry G, Frick K, Brueck R, et al. Training of Dental Professionals in Motivational Interviewing can Heighten Interdental Cleaning Self-Efficacy in Periodontal Patients. Front Psychol. 2016;7:254 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00254

12. Manji F, Dahlen G, Fejerskov O. Caries and Periodontitis: Contesting the Conventional Wisdom on Their Aetiology. Caries Res. 2018;52:548-564 https://doi.org/10.1159/000488948

13. Orekhova LYu, Musaeva RS, Silina ES, Aleksandrova AA, Grinenko EV, Loboda ES. Features of hard tooth and periodontal tissues among women with diabetes mellitus in various trimesters of pregnancy. Parodontologiya. 2019;24(1):29-33 (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25636/PMP.1.2019.1.5

14. Ulitovskiy SB, Kalinina OV. Study of the functional state of periodontal disease in older people and its correction by means of oral hygiene. Advances in Gerontology. 2020;33(3):555-560 (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.34922/AE.2020.33.3.018

15. Costalonga M, Herzberg MC. The oral microbiome and the immunobiology of periodontal disease and caries. Immunology Letters. 2014;162:22-38 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imlet.2014.08.017

16. Crielaard W, Zaura E, Schuller AA, Huse SM, Montijn RC, Keijser BJ. Exploring the oral microbiota of children at various development stages of their dentition in relation to their oral health. BMC Med Genomics. 2011;4:22 https://doi.org/10.1186/1755-8794-4-22

17. Dahlen G, Luan WM, Dahlgren U, Papapanou PN, Baelum V, Fejerskov O. Subgingival bacterial clusters and serum antibody response as markers of extent and severity of periodontitis in adult Chinese. Eur J Oral Sci. 2016;124:179-187 https://doi.org/10.1111/eos.12256

18. Dige I, Gronkjaer L, Nyvad B. Molecular studies of the structural ecology of natural occlusal caries. Caries Res. 2014;48:451-460 https://doi.org/10.1159/000357920

19. Orekhova LYu, Musaeva RS, Loboda ES, Grinenko EV, Chuprinina AV, Ryazantseva ES. Analysis of anti-inflammatory toothpastes efficiency among patients with diabetes mellitus and chronic generalized periodontitis. Parodontologiya. 2020;25(1):47-53 (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33925/1683-3759-2020-25-1-47-53

20. Slazhneva ES, Atrushkevich VG, Orekhova LYu, Rumyantsev KA, Loboda ES, Zajceva OS. Comparative evaluation of changes in the periodontal microbiome in patients with chronic generalized periodontitis after Vector-therapy. Parodontologiya. 2020;25(3):190-200 (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33925/1683-3759-2020-25-3-190-200

21. Orekhova LYu, Petrov AA, Loboda ES, Berezkina IV, Shadrina KV. Study of functional state of microcirculatory channel system in periodontal tissues in persons of different age groups. Pediatric dentistry and dental profilaxis. 2020;20(2):88-94 (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33925/1683-3031-2020-20-2-88-94

22. Momeni SS, Beno SM, Baker JL, Edlund A, Ghazal T, Childers NK, et al. Caries-Associated Biosynthetic Gene Clusters in Streptococcus mutans. Journal of Dental Research. 2020;99(8):969-976 https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034520914519

23. Tang X, Kudo Y, Baker JL, LaBonte S, Jordan PA, McKinnie SM, et al. Cariogenic Streptococcus mutans Produces Tetramic Acid Strain-Specific Antibiotics That Impair Commensal Colonization. ACS Infect. Dis. 2020;6(4);563-571 https://doi.org/10.1021/acsinfecdis.9b00365


Review

For citations:


Ulitovskiy S.B., Kalinina O.V., Shevcov A.V., Soloveva E.S., Fok N.K. Evaluation of the preventive care effectiveness in the adults with odontogenic infection given social and hygienic risk factors. Pediatric dentistry and dental prophylaxis. 2021;21(3):175-181. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33925/1683-3031-2021-21-3-175-181

Views: 576


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1683-3031 (Print)
ISSN 1726-7218 (Online)