Preview

Pediatric dentistry and dental prophylaxis

Advanced search

Case series: clinical findings and oral rehabilitation of patients with amelogenesis imperfecta

https://doi.org/10.25636/PMP.3.2018.5.1.1

Abstract

Children with amelogenesis imperfecta experience many oral difficulties including sensitivity and aesthetics. The methods of treating AI children are limited and therefore a program of care was evaluated in order to assess the clinical efficacy of providing preventive and restorative treatments. A non-randomised convenience sample of 12 patients with AI was evaluated. A comprehensive patient history was recorded, followed by a clinical and radiographic assessment of oral health. In 8/12 patients a hypoplastic form of AI was diagnosed, in 2/12 cases hypomaturation and in 2/12 cases hypocalcified form were noted. Chief complaints were mainly related to unsatisfactory aesthetics and dental sensitiv ity. In 8 patients there was active dental caries. Most of the patients had gingivitis and showed fair oral hygiene. The presence of non-enamel dental anomalies was recorded in 9 patients. All patients received meticulous preventive care. Initial treatment depended on AI type and oral health of the patient. During the transition period, both conventional and resin modified glass- ionomer cements, as well as composite resin materials, were used to restore posterior teeth. Direct composite resin res- torations were used to improve the appearance of anterior teeth. In 4 patients a long-lasting interdisciplinary approach including orthodontics, metal-ceramic crowns and fixed par- tial dentures, and direct composite restorations was required. Follow-up periods varied between 2–11 years. All children have been regularly recalled at 3 monthly inter- vals. Caries prevalence has remained low during the follow-up postoperative period and patients have reported satisfaction with the treatment they have received. AI is associated with multiple non-enamel anomalies and requires a complex treatment. Treatment planning is related to the age of the patient, the type and severity of the disorder, and the oral health of the patient. Early diagnosis, preventive care and timely treatment are of foremost importance to improve oral health in children with AI.

About the Authors

Д. Маркович
Белградский университет
Russian Federation


Б. Петрович
Белградский университет
Russian Federation


Т. Перич
Белградский университет
Russian Federation


References

1. World Health Organization. Oral Health Surveys. Basic methods. 4th ed.

2. Sundell S. Hereditary amelogenesis imperfecta. I. Oral health in children // Swed Dent J. 1986. №10. Р. 151–163.

3. Yip H. K., Tay F. R., Ngo H. C. et al. Bonding of contemporary glass-ionomer cements to dentin // Dent Mater. 2001. №17. Р. 456–470.

4. Witkop C. J. Jr. Amelogenesis imperfecta, dentinogenesis imperfecta and dentin dysplasia revisited: problems in classification // J Oral Pathol. 1988. №17. Р. 547–553.

5. Seow W. K. Taurodontism of the mandibular first permanent molar distinguishes between the tricho-dento-osseous (TDO) syndrome and amelogenesis imperfect // Clin Gent. 1993. №43. Р. 240–246.

6. Seow W. K., Amaratunge A. The effect of acid-etching on enamel from different clinical variants of amelogenesis imperfect // Pediatr Dent. 1998. №20. Р. 37–42.

7. Seow W. K. Clinical diagnosis and management strategies of amelogenesis imperfectavariants // Pediatr Dent. 1993. №15. Р. 384–393.

8. Saroglu I., Aras S., Oztas D. Effect of deproteinization on composite bond strenght in hypocalcified amelogenesis imperfect // Oral Dis. 2006. №12. Р. 305–308.

9. Sadighpour L., Geramipanah F., Nikzad S. Fixed rehabilitation of an ACP PDI class III patient with amelogenesis imperfect // J Prosthodont. 2009. №18. Р. 64–70.

10. Sanchez-Quevedo M. C., Ceballos G., Garcia J. M. et al. Dentine structure and mineralization in hypocalcified amelogenesis imperfecta: a quantitative X-ray histochemical study // Oral Dis. 2004. №10. Р. 94–98.

11. Rowley R., Hill F. J., Winter G. B. An investigation of the association between anterior open-byte and amelogenesis imperfect // Am J Orthod. 1982. №81. Р. 229–235.

12. Poulsen S., Gjorup H., Haubek D. et al. Amelogenesis imperfecta — a systematic literature review of associated dental and orofacial abnormalities and their impact on patients // Acta Odontol Scand. 2008. №66. Р. 193–199.

13. Peters E., Cohen M., Altini M. Rough hypoplastic amelogenesis imperfecta with follicular hyperplasia // Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1992. №74. Р. 87–92

14. J Prosthet Dent. 2004. №92. Р. 112–115.

15. Ooya K., Nalbandian J., Noikura T. Autosomal recessive rough hypoplastic amelogenesis imperfecta. A case report with clinical, light microscopic, radiographic, and electron microscopic observations // Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1998. №65. Р. 449–458.

16. Ozturk N., Sari Z., Ozturk B. An interdisciplinary approach for restoring function and esthetics in a patient with amelogenesis imperfecta and malocclusion: a clinical report //

17. Nusier M., Yassin O., Hart T. C. et al. Phenotypic diversity and revision of the autosomal recessive amelogenesis imperfect // Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2004. №97. Р. 220–330.

18. Löe H. The gingival index, the plaque index and the retention index systems // J Periodont. 1967. №38. Р. 610–616.

19. Nakata M., Kimura O., Bixler D. Interradicular dentin dysplasia associated with amelogenesis imperfect // Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1985. №60. Р. 182–187.

20. Hiraishi N., Yiu C. K., King N. M. Effect of acid etching time on bond strenght of an etchand-rinse adhesives to primary tooth dentine affected by amelogen- esis imperfect // Int J Paediatr Dent. 2008. №18. Р. 224–230.

21. Lindunger A., Smedberg J. I. A retrospective of the prosthodontic management of patients with amelogenesis imperfect // Int J Prosthodont. 2005. №18. Р. 189–194.

22. Fritz G. W. Amelogenesis imperfecta and multiple impactions // Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1981. №51. Р. 460.

23. Greene J. C., Vermillion J. R. The simplified oral hygiene index // J Am Dent Assoc. 1964. №68. Р. 7–13.

24. Deeley K., Letra A., Rose E. K. et al. Possible association of amelogenin to high caries experience in a Gutemalan-Mayan population // Caries Res. 2008. №42. Р. 8–13.

25. Collins M. A., Mauriello S. M., Tyndall D. A. et al. Dental anomalies associated with amelogenesis imperfecta: a radiographic assessment // Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1999. №88. Р. 358–364.

26. Coffield K. D., Philips C., Brady M. et al. The psychosocial impact of developmen- tal dental defects in people with hereditary amelogenesis imperfect // J Am Dent Assoc. 2005. №136. Р. 620–630 207 European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry // 11 (Issue 4). 2010.

27. Bailleul-Forestier I., Molla M., Verloes A. et al. The genetic basis of inherited anomalies of the teeth. Part 1: Clinical and molecular aspects of non- syndromic dental disorders // Eur J Med Genet. 2008. №51. Р. 273–291.

28. Aren G., Ozdemir D., Firatli S. et al. Evaluation of oral manifestations in an amelogenesis imperfecta population // J Dent. 2003. №31. Р. 585–591.

29. Backan B, Holm AK. Amelogenesis imperfecta: prevalence and incidence in a northern Swedish county // Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1986. №14. Р. 43–47.


Review

For citations:


 ,  ,   Case series: clinical findings and oral rehabilitation of patients with amelogenesis imperfecta. Pediatric dentistry and dental prophylaxis. 2018;18(5):11-18. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25636/PMP.3.2018.5.1.1

Views: 447


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1683-3031 (Print)
ISSN 1726-7218 (Online)