Preview

Pediatric dentistry and dental prophylaxis

Advanced search

Mandibular distraction osteogenesis in adolescents as an alternative to orthognathic surgery: a clinical case series

https://doi.org/10.33925/1683-3031-2025-953

Abstract

Relevance. Mandibular underdevelopment in adolescents without syndromic pathology is often associated with temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorders and presents with marked facial asymmetry, malocclusion, and functional impairment. Conventional orthognathic surgery in patients with incomplete facial skeletal growth carries a high risk of relapse and considerable surgical morbidity. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis (DO) is regarded as a less invasive alternative to orthognathic surgery.

Clinical case descriptions. Three adolescents (two females, 17 years; one male, 16 years) with nonsyndromic mandibular hypoplasia secondary to TMJ degenerative changes were included in case series. All patients underwent mandibular distraction osteogenesis using intraoral curvilinear distractors (Conmet, Moscow, Russia). Preoperative planning was performed using multislice computed tomography (MSCT) and lateral cephalometric radiography. Mandibular elongation aranged from 12 to 16 mm. Treatment resulted in substantial correction of facial asymmetry, normalization of occlusion, and satisfactory regenerate quality, as confirmed on CT and ultrasonography. No complications were observed.

Conclusion. In adolescents, intraoral curvilinear distractors provide an effective, minimally invasive approach to correcting nonsyndromic mandibular hypoplasia, reducing the need for orthognathic surgery and minimizing complications.

About the Authors

P. I. Shapovalov
Central Research Institute of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery
Russian Federation

Pavel I. Shapovalov, DDS, Department of the Surgical Treatment of Cranio-Maxillofacial Anomalies

16 Timura Frunze Str., Moscow, 119021



F. F. Losev
Central Research Institute of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery
Russian Federation

Fedor F. Losev, DMD, PhD, DSc, Professor, Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Honored Scientist of the Russian Federation, Head of the Central Research Institute of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery

Moscow



A. A. Kulakov
Central Research Institute of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery
Russian Federation

Anatoliy A. Kulakov, DDS, PhD, DSc, Professor, Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Honored Scientist of the Russian Federation, Scientific Director

Moscow



O. V. Gevorkyan
Central Research Institute of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery
Russian Federation

Gevorkyan O. Vladimirovich, MD, PhD, Head of the Department of Surgical Treatment of Craniofacial Anomalies

Moscow



References

1. Ivanov A.L., Chikurov G.Yu., Nadtochiy A.G., Starikova N.V. Application of semi-buried curvilinear distraction devices in complex management of lower micrognathia in children. Stomatology. 2016;95(2):37-47 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/stomat201695237-47

2. Nadtochiy A.G., Ovchinnikov I.A., Alborova E.V. et al. The condition of the mandibular bone regenerate in the remote period after compression-distraction osteosynthesis. Stomatology. 2024;103(4):28 32 (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17116/stomat202410304128

3. Ramanathan M, Kiruba GA, Christabel A, Parameswaran A, Kapoor S, Sailer HF. Distraction Osteogenesis Versus Orthognathic Surgery: Demystifying Differences in Concepts, Techniques and Outcomes. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2020;19(4):477-489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-020-01414-y

4. Mofid MM, Manson PN, Robertson BC, Tufaro AP, Elias JJ, Vander Kolk CA. Craniofacial distraction osteogenesis: a review of 3278 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108(5):1103-14; discussion 1115-7 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200110000-00001

5. Yu X, Wang J, Hou S, Zeng R. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis in the treatment of pediatric temporomandibular joint ankylosis with micrognathia and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: A case report with 4-year follow-up. Exp Ther Med. 2019;18(6):4888-4892 https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2019.8119

6. Tsui WK, Yang Y, Cheung LK, Leung YY. Distraction osteogenesis as a treatment of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: A systematic review. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(36):e4674. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000004674

7. Ortiz Monasterio F, Molina F, Andrade L, Rodriguez C, Sainz Arregui J. Simultaneous mandibular and maxillary distraction in hemifacial microsomia in adults: avoiding occlusal disasters. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;100(4):852-61. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199709001-00005

8. Gabbay JS, Heller JB, Song YY, Wasson KL, Harrington H, Bradley JP. Temporomandibular joint bony ankylosis: comparison of treatment with transport distraction osteogenesis or the Matthews device arthroplasty. J Craniofac Surg. 2006;17(3):516–522. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001665-200605000-00022

9. Meazzini MC, Mazzoleni F, Gabriele C, Bozzetti A. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis in hemifacial microsomia: long-term follow-up. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2005;33(6):370-376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2005.07.004

10. Rhee ST, Buchman SR. Pediatric mandibular distraction osteogenesis: the present and the future. J Craniofac Surg. 2003;14(5):803-808. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001665-200309000-00040


Supplementary files

Review

For citations:


Shapovalov P.I., Losev F.F., Kulakov A.A., Gevorkyan O.V. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis in adolescents as an alternative to orthognathic surgery: a clinical case series. Pediatric dentistry and dental prophylaxis. 2025;25(2). (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33925/1683-3031-2025-953

Views: 262


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1683-3031 (Print)
ISSN 1726-7218 (Online)