Objectives and potential of follow-up care for patients with congenital orofacial clefts complicated by associated congenital malformations
https://doi.org/10.33925/1683-3031-2025-866
Abstract
Relevance. Follow-up care, as a systematic approach integrating therapeutic, diagnostic, and rehabilitative measures for patients with congenital orofacial clefts (OFC) in combination with congenital malformations (CM) of other organs and systems, is continuously evolving to improve patient outcomes.
Objective. To enhance the rehabilitation outcomes of children with OFC and associated CM by implementing innovations in follow-up care and treatment strategies.
Materials and methods. The study was conducted at the Bonum Multidisciplinary Clinical Medical Center (Yekaterinburg). Medical records of 2,475 patients with congenital OFC over a 25-year period (1998–2022) were analyzed. In 823 cases (33.25%), OFC was associated with CM of other organs and systems. The analysis of medical records for these 823 patients included an assessment of the perinatal history of the newborn and the mother, inpatient treatment records, and the timing of surgical interventions. Additionally, discharge summaries were reviewed to evaluate the effectiveness of a comprehensive, staged, multidisciplinary approach to care.
Results. The study identified the distribution of congenital orofacial clefts and associated CM among the 823 patients. The timing of primary cleft repair surgeries was analyzed, considering the presence of associated CM. The early and late postoperative periods were managed in accordance with a structured methodological algorithm for comprehensive restorative treatment, ensuring the sequential correction of primary and associated malformations. The effectiveness of the proposed approach to comprehensive preparation and surgical management was confirmed by a low rate of postoperative complications. Associated CM of other organs and systems were treated electively by specialized professionals from regional pediatric rehabilitation centers within the Bonum structure. Their interventions were coordinated through multidisciplinary case conferences at all stages of high-tech medical care.
Conclusions. The proposed strategy for follow-up care of patients with congenital OFC complicated by associated CM allowed for the systematization of therapeutic and rehabilitative measures, optimization of the timing, methods, and extent of primary surgical interventions, and improvement of specialized care outcomes for this patient population.
Keywords
About the Authors
Yu. S. RogozhinaRussian Federation
Yulia S. Rogozhina, DDS, PhD, Maxillofacial and Plastic surgeon; Assistant Professor, Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics
9a Academic Bardin Str., Yekaterinburg
S. I. Blokhina
Russian Federation
Svetlana I. Blokhina, DDS, PhD, DSc, Professor, Department of the Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics
Yekaterinburg
E. S. Bimbas
Russian Federation
Evgenia S. Bimbas, DMD, DSc, Professor, Head of the Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics
Yekaterinburg
References
1. Ershova AA, Venchikova NA, Gusina AA, Lazarevich AA, Naumchik IV. Prenatal Diagnosis of Orofacial Clefts in the Prevention of Childhood Disability and Mortality. Forcipe. 2022;5(S2):198-199. (In Russ.) Available from: https://ojs3.gpmu.org/index.php/forcipe/article/view/4475
2. Rogozhina YS, Blokhina SI, Bimbas ES, Naboichenko ES. Prenatal ultrasound diagnostics and socio-psychological support in a complex of rehabilitation measures for patients with congenital cleft maxillofacial region complicated by anomalies of other organs and systems. Russian Medicine. 2024;30(2):110-121. (In Russ.) doi:10.17816/medjrf569952
3. Guichoud Y, El Ezzi O, de Buys Roessingh A. Cleft Lip and Palate Antenatal Diagnosis: A Swiss University Center Performance Analysis. Diagnostics. 2023;13(15):2479. doi:10.3390/diagnostics13152479
4. Haj M, Koudstaal MJ, Ramcharan MS, Hoogeboom AJM, Koster MPH, Srebniak MI, et al. Undetected anomalies in foetuses with a prenatal diagnosis of isolated cleft. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020;49(12):1576-1583. doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2020.05.005
5. Huanhuan Ding, Weizeng Zheng, Xinfen Xu, Baohua Li. Factors influencing parental pregnancy decision-making due to fetuses with non-syndromic orofacial clefts: a study of Chinese couples. Clin. Exp. Obstet. Gynecol. 2022;49(1):8. doi:10.31083/j.ceog4901008
6. Maarse W, Rozendaal AM, Pajkrt E, VermeijKeers C, Mink van der Molen AB, van den Boogaard MJ. A systematic review of associated structural and chromosomal defects in oral clefts: when is prenatal genetic analysis indicated? J Med Genet. 2012;49(8):490-498. doi:10.1136/jmedgenet-2012-101013
7. Sanchez MLN, Benjamin RH, Mitchell LE, Langlois PH, Canfield MA, Swartz MD et al. Birth Defect CoOccurrence Patterns Among Infants With Cleft Lip and/ or Palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2022;59(4):417-426. doi:10.1177/10556656211010060
8. Vibert F, Vibert F, Schmidt G, Löffler K, GasiorekWiens A, Henrich W, Verlohren S. Accuracy of prenatal detection of facial clefts and relation between facial clefts, additional malformations and chromosomal abnormalities: a large referral-center cohort. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024;309(5):1971-1980. doi:10.1007/s00404-023-07084-8
9. Topolnitskiy OZ, Chuikin OS. Rehabilitation of children with congenital cleft upper lip and palate in the Republic of Bashkortostan. Modern Problems of Science and Education. 2015(;4):360. (In Russ.) Available from: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23940193
10. Altunhan H, Annagür A, Konak M, Ertuğrul S, Ors R, Koç H. The incidence of congenital anomalies associated with cleft palate/cleft lip and palate in neonates in the Konya region, Turkey. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;50(6):541-544. doi:10.1016/j.bjoms.2011.08.001
11. Fell M, Fitzsimons KJ, Hamilton MJ, Medina J, Butterworth S, Park MH, et al. Cleft lip Sidedness and the Association with Additional Congenital Malformations. The Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal. 2024: 10556656241261918 doi:10.1177/10556656241261918
12. Ko H, Chang TY, Lussier EC, Olisova K, Sung CY, Chen PK, и др. Multidisciplinary team approach to the prenatal management of orofacial clefts: a single center cohort study in Taiwan. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):13916. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-70906-1
13. Násser LS, Martelli DRB, Swerts MSO, Popoff DAV, Barros LM, Martelli Júnior H. Alterações oftalmológicas na fissura lábio palatina. Rev Bras Oftalmol. 2016;75(2):94-98. doi:10.5935/0034-7280.20160021
14. Parham MJ, Simpson AE, Moreno TA, Maricevich RS. Updates in Cleft Care. Semin Plast Surg. 2023;37(4):240-252. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1776733
15. Pereira AV, Fradinho N, Carmo S, de Sousa JM, Rasteiro D, Duarte R, и др. Associated Malformations in Children with Orofacial Clefts in Portugal: A 31-Year Study. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018;6(2):e1635. doi:10.1097/GOX.0000000000001635
16. Rogozhina YuS, Blokhina SI, Bimbas ES. Predictive factors reducing the effectiveness of the rehabilitation process in patients with congenital orofacial clefts combined with malformations in other organs and systems. Pediatric dentistry and dental prophylaxis. 2024;24(2):139-149. (In Russ.) doi:10.33925/1683-3031-2024-758
17. Fan KL, Black CK, Mantilla-Rivas E, Bulas DI, Rubio E, Blask AR, et al. Coordination of the Fetal Medicine Institute and the Cleft and Craniofacial Center: Application to Early Management of Infants With Cleft Lip and Palate. J Craniofac Surg. 2019;30(7):2061-2064. doi:10.1097/SCS.0000000000005950
18. Hammoudeh JA, Imahiyerobo TA, Liang F, Fahradyan A, Urbinelli L, Lau J, et al. Early Revision of Cleft Lip Correction: A safe and effective approach using a multidisciplinary protocol. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery- Global Open. 2017;5(6):e1340. doi:10.1097/GOX.00000000000001340
19. Rogozhina YuS, Blokhina SI, Bimbas ES, Galeeva KV. Modern tactics of follow-up care and treatment of patients with congenital maxillofacial defects combined with other comorbid conditions. Pediatric dentistry and dental prophylaxis. 2023;23(2):92-103. (In Russ.) doi:10.33925/1683-3031-2023-606
20. Chuykin SV, Davletshin NA, Kuchuk KN, Chuykin OS, Grin EA, Muratov AM. Analysis of results and complications uranoplasty in children with congenital cleft lip and palate. Actual problems in dentistry. 2020;16 (1):133-138. (In Russ.) doi:10.18481/2077-7566-2020-16-1-133-138
21. Abdurrazaq TO, Micheal AO, Lanre AW, Olugbenga OM, Akin LL. Surgical outcome and complications following cleft lip and palate repair in a teaching hospital in Nigeria. Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2013;10(4):345-57. doi:10.4103/0189-6725.125447
22. Omer STE, Ahmed OM, Mahmoud SM, Mohamed AA, Geregandi TM, HabibAlla EH, et al. Cleft Lip Surgery in Sudan: Clinical Presentations, Early Outcomes, and Patient and Professional Satisfaction: A sub-Saharan African experience. JPRAS Open. 2024;41:326-335. doi:10.1016/j.jpra.2024.06.016
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Rogozhina Yu.S., Blokhina S.I., Bimbas E.S. Objectives and potential of follow-up care for patients with congenital orofacial clefts complicated by associated congenital malformations. Pediatric dentistry and dental prophylaxis. 2025;25(1):92-101. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33925/1683-3031-2025-866