Forecasting changes in oral hygiene levels using the API index with different orthodontic appliances
https://doi.org/10.33925/1683-3031-2024-757
Abstract
Relevance. The prevalence of various types of orthodontic pathology among the Russian population is quite high. Depending on the region, malocclusion are registered in 30.9% to 76.5% of cases. The high prevalence of orthodontic pathology and the unresolved issues related to both the pathology itself and the presence of concomitant diseases indicate the necessity for personalized methods of prevention and treatment of malocclusion during both the primary and mixed dentitions, which in 70-84% of cases are treated using both removable and fixed orthodontic appliances.
Materials and methods. An observational study was conducted to identify factors contributing to the increased intensity of caries among children aged 6 to 11 with orthodontic pathology. The study evaluated the characteristics of hygiene knowledge and skills, as well as the Approximal Plaque Index (API), in children using various orthodontic appliances. To assess hygiene knowledge levels, a survey was administered to two groups of children aged 6-11: those undergoing orthodontic treatment and those who visited the dental clinic for a routine check-up and were diagnosed with orthodontic pathology. The questionnaire included questions about the primary and supplementary tools and practices for daily oral hygiene, the frequency of hygiene activities, and the patients' awareness of the importance of professional oral hygiene.
Results. Factors that statistically significantly influence the level of hygiene and the Approximal Plaque Index (API) were identified. A computer program was developed to forecast the dynamics of oral hygiene levels (based on the API index) when using different orthodontic appliances. An algorithm for predicting changes in the API hygiene index was created, considering the use of orthodontic appliances, oral status, adherence to hygiene procedures, presence of harmful habits, and dietary behaviors. Negative factors significantly impacting hygiene levels include bruxism and daily consumption of sweets, while positive factors include adherence to the recommended frequency and duration of tooth brushing (at least twice a day) and the use of a medium-hard toothbrush when permanent teeth are erupting. During orthodontic treatment, additional negative factors impacting hygiene status include gingival bleeding (gingivitis), lack of lip closure, and harmful habits. The study of changes in hygiene levels over one year of treatment with various orthodontic appliances (braces, Haas appliance, SPA) showed that the fixed Haas appliance for treating dental and maxillofacial anomalies is the most favorable orthodontic design for mixed dentition.
Conclusion. Factors significantly affecting the level of oral hygiene have been identified. The dynamics of the API hygiene index with various orthodontic appliances have been established. The most favorable appliance for mixed dentition is the HAAS appliance for rapid palatal expansion.
About the Authors
K. V. FedorovaRussian Federation
Kseniya V. Fedorova, DMD, Orthodontist, „Impuls” dental clinic
Tver
O. A. Gavrilova
Russian Federation
Olga A. Gavrilova, DMD, PhD, DSc, Professor, Head of the Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics
Tver
A. M. Zatevalov
Russian Federation
Alexander M. Zatevalov, PhD, DSc, Chief Research fellow
Moscow
References
1. Ippolitov YA, Tatarincev MM, Kovalenko ME, Zolotareva EJ, Anisimov NA. Assessment of epidemiological picture of prescool-children’s dento-maxillary anomalies and deformations with premature loss of temporary teeth. Vestnik novyh medicinskih tehnologij. 2013;(1):232 (In Russ.). Available from: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21055818
2. Tihonov VE, Mitin NE, Grishin MI. Prevalence and structure of maxillodental anomalies in primary schoolboys in Ryazan. The actual problems in dentistry. 2017;13(2):83-87 (In Russ.). doi: 10.18481/2077-7566-2017-13-2-83-87
3. Ayupova FS, Tereshchenko LF. Structure of dental alveolar anomalies in chikdren taking orthodontic advice. Kursk Scientific and Practical Bulletin "Man and His Health". 2013; (4):50-54 (In Russ.). Available from: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21283400
4. Zubareva AV, Garaeva KL, Isaeva AI. Prevalence of dentoalveolar anomalies in children and adolescents (review). European research. 2015.;(11):128-132. (In Russ.). Availble from: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25186902
5. Dzhuraeva ShF, Vorobev MV, Moseeva MV, Tropina AA. Prevalence of dental anomalies in children and adolescents and factors influencing their formation. Scientific review. Medical Sciences.2022;(6):70-75 (In Russ.). Available from: https://science-medicine.ru/ru/article/view?id=1306
6. Anohina AV, Gazizullina OR. Adherence to orthodontic treatment at various stages of development of dentoalveolar system. Orthodontiya. 2007;(2):7-10 (In Russ.). Available from: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=12845116
7. Bolovina YaP, Vologina MV, Fital EA, Bolovina AD. The problem of compliance of orthodontic patients in the Volgograd region. Vestnik VolGMU. 2019;70(2):51-54 (In Russ.). doi: 10.19163/1994-9480-2019-2(70)-51-54
8. Voskanyan AR, Alekseenko SN, Ayupova FS. Problem and rendering assistance perspective to the children with dento-maxillary (dentoalveoalr) anomalies. Medical News of the North Caucasus. 2016;(3):452-456 (In Russ.). doi: 10.14300/mnnc.2016.11102
9. Mohamad IS, Vodolatsky VM. Prevalence of dentoalveolar anomalies and deformations in children and adolescents. JNMT, eEdition. 2020(1):7-10 (In Russ.). doi: 10.24411/2075-4094-2020-16527
10. Medveditskova AI, Abramova MYa, Lukina GI. Problem-oriented analysis of the effectiveness of an interdisciplinary approach in the provision of complex treatment of patients with dentoalveolar anomalies and deformities. Russian Journal of Stomatology. 2021;14(4):46‑50. (In Russ.). doi:10.17116/rosstomat20211404146
11. Denisova VYU, Carlash AE, Ryzhova IP, Gontarev SN, Denisov MM, Gontareva IS. The frequency of cases of dentoalveolar anomalies in children at the recepyion of the orthodontist. Vestnik novyh medicinskih tehnologij. 2017;(4):151-154. (In Russ.). doi: 10.12737/article_5a1f9bf66d9fa8.96196997
12. Nigmatov RN, Nigmatova IM, Nodirkhonova MO. Interrelation of dentoalveolar anomalies and diseases of the musculoskeletal system in children during the period of a shift bite (review article). Stomatologia. 2019;77 (4): 57-64. (In Russ.). doi:10.26739/2091-5845-2019-4-16
13. Gvozdeva YuV, Danilova MA. Condition of the somatic status in children with severe myofunctional disturbances in early age children. Orthodontiya. 2009;(3):6-8 (In Russ.). Available from: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=18764678
14. Distel VA, Suntsov VG, Vagner VD, Karnitskaya IV. A method for the prevention and treatment of dental anomalies associated with impaired nasal breathing. Dentistry. 1998;(2):53-54 (In Russ.). Available from: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=30110069
15. Мahony D. Combining functional appliances in the straightwire system. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2002;26(2):137-140. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.26.2.r617n2568mq4403v
16. Huynh T, Kennedy DB, Joondeph DR, Bollen AM. Treatment response and stability of slow maxillary expansion using Haas, hyrax, and quad-helix appliances: a retrospective study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;Sep;136(3):331-339. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.08.026
17. Churakova YA, Antonova AA. Influence of orthodontic treatment with removable devices in children on the properties of oral fluid. Pediatric dentistry and dental prophylaxis. 2020;20(1):59-62 (In Russ.). doi: 10.33925/1683-3031-2020-20-1-59-62
18. Fedorova KV, Gavrilova OA, Smirnova AA, Motornova EV, Mikhalyova II. Improving the quality of oral hygiene in schoolchildren with dentalalveolar anomalies. Cathedra-Department. Dental education. 2022;(81):70-73 (In Russ.). Available from: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=49744986
19. Lange DE, Plagmann HC, Eenboom A, Promesberger A. Klinische Bewertungsverahren zur Objektivierung der Mundhygiene [Clinical methods for the objective evaluation of oral hygiene]. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z. 1977;32(1):44-47. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/264444/ https://www.iperiopal.com/sbi-api-index/
20. Popova AN., Kraynov SV, Makhina MS, Ramazanova LU, Ponomareva KV. Optimization of interdental hygiene. Reconceptulization. Modern problems of science and education. 2018(4):153 (In Russ.). doi: 10.17513/spno.27757
21.
Review
For citations:
Fedorova K.V., Gavrilova O.A., Zatevalov A.M. Forecasting changes in oral hygiene levels using the API index with different orthodontic appliances. Pediatric dentistry and dental prophylaxis. 2024;24(2):167-175. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33925/1683-3031-2024-757