Preview

Pediatric dentistry and dental prophylaxis

Advanced search

Effect of maxillary constriction orthodontic correction using a fixed appliance with a screw in teenagers during a growth spurt

https://doi.org/10.33925/1683-3031-2023-564

Abstract

Relevance. The research is relevant because of a high prevalence of anterior and posterior crowding in children with mixed and permanent dentition (from 42 to 86 %), for whom the correction of the dentition form and the size is recommended by fixed expanding appliances with a screw. After the teenage growth spurt, the growth and development of jaws end, steady pathological signs form, there are psychological problems in a face and smile selfperception, and the question of the orthodontic treatment duration arises.

Purpose. To study the effectiveness of treatment of patients with maxillary premolar area constriction during growth spurt using two modifications of fixed Hyrax expander.

Material and methods. We examined 22 male patients aged 10.6 to 13 y.o. (average age 11.2 ± 1.6 years old) with permanent dentition, constriction of the posterior teeth and crowding of incisors, treated with a fixed expander (Hyrax appliance) in the upper jaw during the growth spurt. The patients formed two groups. Group 1 (n = 11) had the Hyrax screw at the level of the upper first premolars, and Group 2 (n = 11) had the Hyrax lock located at the first permanent molars. The patients activated the expander independently by ¼ turn every other day for six months. Then the appliance remained in the mouth for three months. We studied the maxillary expansion results on plaster models before and after six months of the expander fixation using the Tonn, Pont, Korkhaus, Bolton method.

Results. The study has established that orthodontic correction of transversal abnormalities with a fixed Hyrax expander affects the maxillary posterior teeth expansion, changes their parameters and improves their movement. At the same time, in Group 1, the width between the first premolars and the first molars reached the norm calculated from the sum of the mesiodistal dimensions of the upper incisors, and in Group 2, the width between the first permanent molars exceeded the normal, and inter-first-premolar distance did not reach the normal values for three months of activation.

Conclusion. Fixed Hyrax expander showed the best results if the screw was at the level of first premolars during the teenage growth spurt.

About the Authors

T. F. Kosyreva
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia
Russian Federation

Tamara F. Kosyreva, DMD, PhD, DSc, Professor, Department of Paediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics

Moscow



A. S. Biryukov
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia
Russian Federation

Alexey S. Biryukov, DMD, PhD, Senior Lecturer, Department of Paediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics

Moscow



O. V. Voeykova
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia
Russian Federation

Olga V. Voeykova, DMD, PhD, Senior Lecturer, Department of Paediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics

Moscow



M. V. Samoylova
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia
Russian Federation

Maryana V. Samoylova, DMD, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Paediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics

Moscow



N. V. Gorshunova
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia
Russian Federation

Natalia V. Gorshunova, DMD, PhD Student, Department of Paediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics

Moscow



Almasri Rasha
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia
Russian Federation

Almasri Rasha, DMD, PhD Student, Department of Paediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics

Moscow



Alhamzah Gharawi
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia
Russian Federation

Alhamza Gharawi, DMD, Resident, Department of Paediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics

Moscow



References

1. McNamara JA Jr, McNamara L, Graber LW. Optimizing orthodontic and dentofacial orthopedic treatment timing. In: Graber LW, Vanarsdall RL, Vig KWL, eds. Orthodontics: Current Principles and Techniques. 5th edition. Philadelphia: Mosby; 2012:483p. Available from: https://www.orthodontics-principles-techniques.com/chap14.php

2. Kosyreva TF, Biruykov AS, Voeykova OV, Davidian OM. Efficacy of vacuum-gradient therapy in reducing orthodontic treatment time. Stomatologiya. 2020;99(5):69 73 (In Russ.). doi: 10.17116/stomat20209905169

3. Sabrina Mutinelli, Mauro Cozzani. Rapid maxillary expansion in contemporary orthodontic literature. APOS. Trends in Orthodontics. 2016;6(3):129. doi: 10.4103/2321-1407.183148

4. Rosa M, Lucchi P, Manti G, Caprioglio A. Rapid Palatal Expansion in the absence of posterior cross-bite to intercept maxillary incisor crowding in the mixed dentition: a CBCT evaluation of spontaneous changes of untouched permanent molars. European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 2016;17(4):286-294. Available from: https://europepmc.org/article/med/28045316

5. Mohammad Z, Cheruku SR, Penmetcha S, Namineni S, Vaaka PH. Customized Modified Haas Palatal Ex pansion in Mixed Dentition: A Case Report. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10(10):ZD01-ZD04. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/20394.8655

6. Samandara A, Papageorgiou SN, Ioannidou-Marathiotou J, Kavvadia-Tsatala S, Papadopoulos MA. Evaluation of orthodontically induced external root resorption following orthodontic treatment using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT): a systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Orthodontics. 2019;41(1):67-79. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjy027

7. Ugolini A, Cerruto C, Di Vece L, Ghislanzoni LH, Sforza Ch, Doldo T, et al. Dental arch response to Haastype rapid maxillary expansion anchored to deciduous vs permanent molars: A multicentric randomized controlled trial. Angle Orthod. 2015;85(4):570-576. doi: 10.2319/041114-269.1

8. Quinzi V, Federici Canova F, Rizzo FA, Marzo G, Rosa M, Primozic J. Factors related to maxillary expander loss due to anchoring deciduous molars exfoliation during treatment in the mixed dentition phase. Eur J Orthod. 2021;43(3):332-337. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjaa061

9. Digregorio MV, Fastuca R, Zecca PA, Caprioglio A, Lagravère MO. Buccal bone plate thickness after rapid maxillary expansion in mixed and permanent dentitions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019;155(2):198-206. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.03.020

10. Gabriel DB, Southard KA, Qian F, Marshall SD, Franciscus RG, Southard TE. Cervical vertebrae maturation method: poor reproducibility. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;136(4):478.e1-480. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.08.028

11. Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA, Jr. The cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of optimal treatment timing in dentofacial orthopedics. Seminars in Orthodics. 2005;11(3):119-129. doi: 10.1053/j.sodo.2005.04.005


Supplementary files

Review

For citations:


Kosyreva T.F., Biryukov A.S., Voeykova O.V., Samoylova M.V., Gorshunova N.V., Rasha A., Gharawi A. Effect of maxillary constriction orthodontic correction using a fixed appliance with a screw in teenagers during a growth spurt. Pediatric dentistry and dental prophylaxis. 2023;23(2):143-152. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33925/1683-3031-2023-564

Views: 346


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1683-3031 (Print)
ISSN 1726-7218 (Online)