Doppler ultrasound assessment results at stages of orthodontic treatment
https://doi.org/10.33925/1683-3031-2022-22-2-128-132
Abstract
Relevance. A modern diagnostic complex when planning orthodontic treatment is impossible without assessing the condition of periodontal tissues.
Purpose. To evaluate the changes in periodontal tissues during orthodontic treatment.
Material and methods. Blood velocity and flow rate in the anterior mandible were compared before and after the orthodontic treatment.
Results. Blood velocity and volumetric blood flow rate significantly increased 6 ± 2 months after the beginning of orthodontic treatment.
Conclusion. Orthodontic movement of crowded teeth using aligners proceeds without excessive pressure, which allows for a smooth and gradual change in the blood velocity and volumetric blood flow rate, pulsation index and peripheral resistance index.
About the Author
I. V. DmitrienkoRussian Federation
Irina V. dmitrienko, DMD, orthodontist, external PhD student, Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics
Perm
References
1. Gvozdeva LM, Danilova MA, Alexandrova LI, Dmitrienko IV. The results of orthodontic treatment using aligners from the perspective of quality of life of patients with dentoalveolar anomalies. Stomatologiya. 2021;100(2):73-75 (In Russ.). doi:10.17116/stomat202110002173
2. Zimbran A, Dudea D, Gasparik C, Dudea S. Ultrasonographic evaluation of periodontal changes during orthodontic tooth movement – work in progress. Clujul Med. 2017;90(1):93-98. doi: 10.15386/cjmed-663
3. Jiang F, Xia Z, Li S, Eckert G, Chen J. Mechanical environment change in root, periodontal ligament, and alveolar bone in response to two canine retraction treatment strategies. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2015;18 Suppl1(01):29-38. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12076
4. Antosik RM. The analysis of the effectiveness of orthodontic treatment of patients with congestion of teeth on aligners dent on 3d- and dpm-technology. Vestnik nauki i obrazovaniâ. 2018;1(37);88-90. Available from: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/analiz-effektivnostiortodonticheskogo-lecheniya-patsientov-so-skuchennostyu-zubov-na-elaynerah-izgotovlennyh-po-3d-idpm-tehnologii
5. Yang L, Li F, Cao M, Chen H, Wang X, Chen X, et al. Quantitative evaluation of maxillary interradicular bone with cone-beam computed tomography for bicortical placement of orthodontic mini-implants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015;147(6):725-737. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.02.018.
6. Montúfar J, Romero M, Scougall-Vilchis RJ. Hybrid approach for automatic cephalometric landmark annotation on cone-beam computed tomography volumes. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018;154(1):140-150. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.08.028
7. Boke F, Gazioglu C, Akkaya S, Akkaya M. Relationship between orthodontic treatment and gingival health: A retrospective study. Eur J Dent. 2014;8(3):373-380. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.137651
8. Zimbran A, Dudea S, Dudea D. Evaluation of periodontal tissues using 40MHz ultrasonography. preliminary report. Med Ultrason. 2013;15(1):6-9. doi: 10.11152/mu.2013.2066.151.az1ept2
9. Chifor R, Hedeşiu M, Bolfa P, Catoi C, Crişan M, Serbănescu A, et al. The evaluation of 20 MHz ultrasonography, computed tomography scans as compared to direct microscopy for periodontal system assessment. Med Ultrason. 2011;Jun;13(2):120-126. Режим доступа: http://www.medultrason.ro/the-evaluation-of-20-mhzultrasonography-computed-tomography-scans-as-compared-to-direct-microscopy-for-periodontal-systemassessment/t
10. Astaf'eva NV, Pisarevsky YL, Kuharenko YV. Application of ultrasonic dopplerography for the estimation of efficiency of orthodontic treatments of crowding position of the teeth. Siberian Medical Journal (Irkutsk). 2009;85(2):43-45 (In Russ.). Available from: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/primenenie-ultrazvukovoy-dopplerografii-dlya-otsenki-effektivnostiortodonticheskogo-lecheniya-skuchennosti-zubov
11. Danilova MA, Dmitrienko IV, Arutyunyan LI. 3D cephalometric assessment of bone tissue condition during the orthodontic treatment with clear aligners. Pediatric dentistry and dental prophylaxis. 2022;22(1):58-62 (In Russ.). doi:10.33925/1683-3031-2021-22-1-58-62
12. Liu H, Sun J, Dong Y, Lu H, Zhou H, Hansen BF, et al. Periodontal health and relative quantity of subgingival Porphyromonas gingivalis during orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod. 2011;81(4):609-15. doi: 10.2319/082310-352.1
13. Zasciurinskiene E, Lindsten R, Slotte C, Bjerklin K. Orthodontic treatment in periodontitis-susceptible subjects: a systematic literature review. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2016;2(2):162-173. doi: 10.1002/cre2.28
14. Azaripour A, Weusmann J, Mahmoodi B, Peppas D, Gerhold-Ay A, Van Noorden CJ, et al. Braces versus Invisalign®: gingival parameters and patients' satisfaction during treatment: a cross-sectional study. BMC Oral Health. 2015;15:69. doi: 10.1186/s12903-015-0060-4
15. Yassir YA, Nabbat SA, McIntyre GT, Bearn DR. Clinical effectiveness of clear aligner treatment compared to fxed appliance treatment: an overview of systematic reviews. Clin Oral Investig. 2022;26(3):2353-2370. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04361-1
16. Robertson L, Kaur H, Fagundes NCF, Romanyk D, Major P, Flores Mir C. Effectiveness of clear aligner therapy for orthodontic treatment: A systematic review. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2020;23(2):133-142. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12353
Review
For citations:
Dmitrienko I.V. Doppler ultrasound assessment results at stages of orthodontic treatment. Pediatric dentistry and dental prophylaxis. 2022;22(2):128-132. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33925/1683-3031-2022-22-2-128-132





























