Modified PDL anesthetic injection technique in the pediatric dental practice
E. N. Anisimova,
N. Yu. Anisimova,
O. S. Kovylina,
D. A. Eliseev,
Yu. N. Metelitsa,
I. A. Kravchenko https://doi.org/10.33925/1683-3031-2021-21-1-35-41
Abstract
Relevance. Effective pain relief is required for high-quality outpatient dental treatment in children. Infiltration and PDL local anesthetic injection techniques are easier and safer for young patients. Purpose – to determine the effectiveness and safety of the modified PDL anesthetic injection technique in the pediatric dental practice.
Materials and methods. The study involved 100 children aged 4 to 7 years, in need of caries and pulpitis treatment in the primary dentition. 4% articaine solutions with 1: 200000 and 1: 400000 epinephrine were administered as a local anesthetic. The effectiveness of the treatment was determined by the visual analogue scale.
Results. The study determined the high effectiveness and safety of the modified technique of PDL anesthetic injection of 4% articaine solution with epinephrine ratio 1:200 000 and 1:400 000 for the treatment of caries and pulpitis in 100 children aged 4-7 years.
Conclusions. The conducted studies have demonstrated the high ffectiveness and safety of the modified PDL anesthetic injection technique of a 4% solution of articaine with epinephrine both at a concentration of 1:200 000 and 1:400 000.
About the Authors
E. N. Anisimova
A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Anisimova Evgenia N., PhD, Associate Professor of the Department of anesthesia in dentistry
Moscow
N. Yu. Anisimova
A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Anisimova Natalia Yu., PhD, Associate professor of the Department of anesthesia in dentistry
Moscow
O. S. Kovylina
A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Kovylina Olga S., PhD, Associate professor of the Department of anesthesia in dentistry
Moscow
D. A. Eliseev
A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Eliseev Denis A., dentist, State Autonomous Healthcare Institution of the Moscow Region Lyubertsy Dental Clinic
Lyubertsy
Yu. N. Metelitsa
A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Metelitsa Yulia N., dentist, Head of Teatment and prevention department of State Autonomous Healthcare Institution of the Moscow Region Korolevskaya dental clinic
Korolev
I. A. Kravchenko
A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Kravchenko Ilona A., Postgraduate Student of the Department of anesthesia in dentistry
Moscow
References
1. Kanno, C.M., de Oliveira, J.A., Cannon, M., Carvalho, A.A. The mandibular lingula's position in children as a reference to inferior alveolar nerve block. Journal of dentistry for children (Chicago, Ill.) 2005;72(2):56-60. Avaliable at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16294933/.
2. Moore, P.A., Boynes, S.G., Hersh, E.V., DeRossi, S.S., Sollecito, T.P., Goodson ,J.M., Leonel, J.S., Floros, C., Peterson, C., Hutcheson, M. The anesthetic efficacy of 4 percent articaine 1:200,000 epinephrine: two controlled clinical trials. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 2006;137(11):1572-81. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2006.0093.
3. Daubländer, M., Kämmerer, P.W., Willershausen, B., Leckel, M., Lauer, H.C., Buff, S., Rösl, B. Clinical use of an epinephrine-reduced (1/400,000) articaine solution in short-ti me dental routine treatments--a multicenter study. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2012;16(4):1289-95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-011-0608-x.
4. Kämmerer P.W., Krämer N., Esch J., H. Pfau., U. Uhlemann., L. Piehlmeier., M. Daubländer. Epinephrine-reduced articaine solution (1:400,000) in paediatric dentistry: a multicentre non-interventional clinical trial. . European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry. 2013;14(2):89-95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-013-0024-9.
5. Kühnisch J., Daubländer M., Klingberg G., Dougall A., Spyridonos Loizides M., Stratigaki E., Amar J.L., Anttonen V., Duggal M., Gizani S. Best clinical practice guidance for local analgesia in paediatric dentistry: an EAPD policy document. European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry. 2017;18(5):313-321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-017-0311-y.
6. Petrikas, A.Zh., Medvedev, D.V. Aspiration of intraossrous, intralingualary and intraseptal dental injections. Endodontics Today. 2013;11(3):49-53. (In Russ.) Avaliable at: https://www.endodont.ru/jour/article/view/551#.
7. Anisimova, E.N., Anisimova, N.Yu., Kovylina, O.S., Kravchenko, I.A. Assessment of pain and pain relief in children. Literature review. Paediatric Dentistry and Prophylaxis. 2020;20(2):101-1048. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.33925/1683-3031-2020-20-2-101-104.
8. Anisimova, E.N., Pershina, L.V., Ermolev, S.N., Orekhova, I.V., Letunova, N.U., Ryzancev, N.A., Gromovik, M.V., Lushanin, M.S., Golikova, A.M., Erilin, E.A. The method of periodontal anesthesia during dental treatment. Institute of Dentistry. 2017; 3(76): 42-48. (In Russ.). Avaliable at: https://instom.spb.ru/catalog/article/10945/.
Review
For citations:
Anisimova E.N., Anisimova N.Yu., Kovylina O.S., Eliseev D.A., Metelitsa Yu.N., Kravchenko I.A. Modified PDL anesthetic injection technique in the pediatric dental practice. Pediatric dentistry and dental prophylaxis. 2021;21(1):35-41. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33925/1683-3031-2021-21-1-35-41
Views:
1155
Email this article 
