An algorithm of orthodontic treatment of teenagers with the bilateral cleft lip and palate
https://doi.org/10.33925/1683-3031-2020-20-4-317-323
Abstract
Relevance. Bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP) is the malformation of the maxillo-facial region caused by the defect of the alveolar bone, palate and upper lip. According to the World Health Organisation, the incidence rate is 0.61.6 per 1000 newborns. The protrusive premaxilla is often treated by osteotomy for esthetic reasons. However, the osteotomy of the protrusive premaxilla slows down the growth of the child’s midface, which leads to the skeletal deformations with complications. The study explores the method that allows performing the premaxillary osteotomy to improve the facial profile in the long term.
Materials and methods. During the study, 12 patients with BCLP aged 10 to 14 were treated from 2016 to 2019. All patients had head computed tomography by Planmeca ProMax. The results were uploaded into the Dolphin Imaging for further cephalometric analysis. The growth was predicted by Ricketts prediction analysis.
Results. The patients were divided into two groups according to the type of the facial growth. The patients of the first group were diagnosed with the vertical type of the growth. The treatment was performed with microimplants. The patients of the second group, with a horizontal growth type, underwent osteotomy of the intermaxillary bone. Consequently, the growth was predictable, which improved the overall facial profile.
Conclusions. The osteotomy of the premaxillary bone is recommended only in patients over 10-11 years with the protrusive premaxilla who were diagnosed with the horizontal growth type.
About the Authors
Ad. A. MamedovRussian Federation
Mamedov Adil A. - MD, PhD, DSc, professor, head of the department of pediatric dentistry and orthodontics of the E.V. Borovsky Institute of Dentistry.
MoscowO. T. Zangieva
Russian Federation
Zangieva Olga T. - MD, assistant of the department of education of the department of pediatric dentistry and orthodontics.
Moscow
R. N. Fedotov
Russian Federation
Fedotov Roman N. - MD, Phd, Associate Professor of the department pediatric maxillofacial surgery, Deputy chief of the university clinic of maxillofacial, plastic surgery and dentistry.
Moscow
L. A. Mazurina
Russian Federation
Mazurina Lina A. - MD, PhD, assistant of the department of education of the department of pediatric dentistry and orthodontics.
Moscow
O. V. Dudnik
Russian Federation
Dudnik Olesya V. - MD, PhD, associate professor of the Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics of the E.V. Borovsky Institute of Dentistry.
Moscow
References
1. Ribeiro L.L., Neves L.T., Costa B., Gomide M.R. Dental anomalies of the permanent lateral incisors and prevalence of hypodontia outside the cleft area in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. 2003;40:2. https://doi.org/10.1597%2F1545-1569_2003_040_0172_daotpl_2.0.co_2.
2. Geraedts C.T.M., Borstlap, W.A., Groenewoud, J.M.M., Stoelinga P.J.W. Long-term evaluation of bilateral cleft lip and palate patients after early secondary closure and premaxilla repositioning. Int J Oral Maxil-lofac Surg 2007;36:788-796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2007.04.010.
3. Turchetta B.J., Fishman L.S., Subtelny J.D. Facial growth prediction; A comparison of methodologies. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;132:439-449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.10.026.
4. Chvatal B.A., Behrents R.G., Ceen R.F., Buschang P.H. Development and testing of multilevel models for longitudinal craniofacial growth prediction. Am J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. 2005;128:45-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.03.035.
5. Hassel B., Farman A.G. Skeletal maturation evaluation using cervical vertebrae. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995;107(1):58-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70157-5.
6. Goodacre T., Swan M. Cleft lip and palate: current management. Paediatericsand Child Health. 2008;18(6):283-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paed.2008.03.008.
7. Bjork, A. Prediction of mandibular growth rotation. Am. J. Orthod. 1969;55:585-599. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(69)90036-0.
8. Downs W.B. Variations in facial relationships: Their significance in treatment and prognosis. Am. J. Orthod. 1948;34:812-840. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(48)90015-3.
9. Mito S., Sato, K., Mitani, H. Predicting mandibular growth potential with cervical vertebral bone age. Am. J. Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;124:173-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(03)00401-3.
10. Power G., Breckon, J., Sherriff, M., McDonald, F. Dolphin ImagingTM Software:an analysis of the accuracy of cephalometric digitization and orthognathic prediction. Int J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2005;34:619-626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2005.04.003.
11. Uysal R., Baysal A., Yagci A. Evaluation of speed, repeatability, and reproducibility of digital radiography with manual versus computer-assisted cephalometric analyses. Eur. J. Orthod. 2009; 31:523-8 https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjp022.
12. Wahl N. Orthodontics in 3 millenia. Chapter 7: Facial analysis before the advent of the cephalometer. Am. J. Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;129:293-298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.12.011.
Review
For citations:
Mamedov A.A., Zangieva O.T., Fedotov R.N., Mazurina L.A., Dudnik O.V. An algorithm of orthodontic treatment of teenagers with the bilateral cleft lip and palate. Pediatric dentistry and dental prophylaxis. 2020;20(4):317-323. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33925/1683-3031-2020-20-4-317-323