Comparison of objective indicators of various properties of photocomposite materials with the subjective assessment of dentists
https://doi.org/10.33925/1683-3031-2020-20-2-95-100
Abstract
Relevance. Composite materials of light curing have a large number of indications for use and are actively used by dentists in clinical practice. The properties of these materials differ from their composition and the size of the filler. We conducted a survey of dentists of general practitioners of public and private dental clinics in Omsk to determine compliance, objective indicators of physico-chemical parameters of the studied composite materials and their subjective assessment by doctors using these materials in their work.
Purpose. Comparison of objective indicators of various properties of photocomposite materials with the subjective assessment of dentists.
Materials and methods. The study of the physicochemical properties of light-cured composite materials most commonly used in the practice of Omsk dentists in public and private clinics. A research design was developed and a survey of 148 dentists in Omsk was conducted to determine the subjective assessment of these materials.
Results. A comparative analysis of the objective and subjective indicators of composite materials.
Conclusions. The physicochemical parameters of the photocomposite materials are fully consistent with the subjective assessment of dentists in Omsk.
About the Authors
G. I. Skripkina
Omsk State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Skripkina Galina I., DSc, Associate Professor, head of the Department of pediatric dentistry
Omsk
A. Zh. Garifullina
Omsk State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Garifullina Albina Zh., PhD, Associate Professor of the Department of pediatric dentistry
Omsk
E. A. Breslavskaja
Omsk State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Breslavskaja Evgeniya A., second-year clinical resident of the Department of pediatric dentistry
Omsk
References
1. K. V. Alejnikov, V. D. Vagner. Efficiency of dosing of composite materials for light curing with standard and modified methods. Stomatology for all. 2010;4:16-18. (In Russ.). https://www.elibrary.ru/contents.asp?issueid=927266.
2. A. V. Vikulin, A. V. Markin. The results of the application of a flowable composite light-cure material «florist» to restore the gingival margin. Dental Forum. 2012;5:35. (In Russ.). http://www.stomadent.ru/articles/composit/flowrest/.
3. A. V. Vasilenko, A. V. Vikulin, T. I. Ibragimov, O. A. Stecjura. The use of a hybrid composite material of light curing for aesthetic restoration of the gingival edge. Dental Forum. 2016;4:18. (In Russ.). https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=27300198&.
4. A. V. Gecman. The temporary incisors of the upper jaw. Stomatology of children's age and prevention. 2015;4(55):17-18. (In Russ.). https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25373522.
5. A. A. Blohina. Options for solving the actual problem of restoring cavities in the side teeth. DentArt. 2012;1:52-57. (In Russ.). https://stomport.ru/articles/varianty-resheniya-aktualnoyproblemy-vosstanovleniya-polostey-v-oblastizhevatelnoy-gruppy.
6. M. A. Danilova, N. A. Machulina, Ju. V. Shevcova, D. V. Kamenskih. Clinical and experimental justification of the use of various filling materials in children of preschool age. Stomatology of children's age and prevention. 2019;2(70):31-36. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.33925/1683-30312019-19-2-31-36.
7. E.E.Maslak Prevalence of dental caries and modern directions of caries prevention. Medical alphabet. 2015;1:28-31. (In Russ.). https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=22985079.
8. S. A. Nikolaenko, E. V. Pechenegina, A. P. Zubarev, Ju. V. Fedorov, U. Lobaujer Comparative characteristics of wear resistance of modern polymer composites. Clinical dentistry. 2017;3(83):4-9. (In Russ.). https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29960524.
9. Ju. A. Mochalov. Methodological approaches to the clinical evaluation of dental photo-composite filling materials as medical devices. Universum. Medicine and dentistry. 2019;9(64). (In Russ.). https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=41317674.
10. R. V. Caixeta, R. D. Guiraldo, E. N. Kaneshima, A. S. Barbosa, C. P. Picolotto, A. E. Lima, A.Gonini Junior, S. B. Berger. Push-Out Bond Strength of Restorations with Bulk-Fill, Flow, and Conventional Resin Composites. Scientific World Journal. 2015;2015:452976. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/452976.
11. B. Baracco, E. Cabrera, I. Giráldez, L. Ceballos, J. Perdigão. Clinical evaluation of a low-shrinkage composite in posterior restorations: one-year results. Operative Dentistry. 2012;37$2:117-129. https://doi.org/10.2341/11-179-C.
12. R. Monterubbianesi, G. Orsini, G. Tosi, C. Conti, V. Librando, M. Procaccini, A. Putignano. Spectroscopic and Mechanical Properties of a New Generation of Bulk Fill Composites. Front Physiol. 2016;7:652. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2016.00652.
13. I. H. Baltacioglu, K. Kamburoglu, O. Irmak, F. Geneci, M. Ocak, M. B. Uzuner, H. H. Celik. Marginal integrity of self-adhering flowable composites used as liner under class ii restorations: a comparative in vitro micro-ct study. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology. 2017;31;24:2719-2729. https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2017.1317472.
14. G. I. Skripkina, A. Zh. Garifullina. Clinical examination as the main clinical approach to the prevention of dental caries in children. Stomatologija. 2015;94;5:64-66. (In Russ.). https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25458536.
15. G. I. Skripkina, A. Zh. Garifullina, T. S. Mitjaeva, Ju. G. Romanova, S. G. Mihajlovskij, V. A. Dmitrieva. Experience in using a double-cured composite material for fixing fiberglass pins and restoring the stump of a tooth in the practice of a pediatric dentist. Endodontics Today. 2015;3:35-37. (In Russ.). https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=24400291.
16. M. V. Korolenkova, A. P. Arzumanjan. Comparative analysis of micro-flow of fillings and standard pediatric crowns when restoring temporary molars after simulation of pulpotomy. Stomatology of children's age and prevention. 2019;19;1(69):46-50. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.33925/16833031-2019-19-69-46-50.
17. Silva Santana S.V. Effect of surface sealants on marginal microleakage in Class V resin composite restorations. J. Esthet. Restor. Dent. 2009;6:397-404. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.17088240.2009.00297.x.
Review
For citations:
Skripkina G.I., Garifullina A.Zh., Breslavskaja E.A. Comparison of objective indicators of various properties of photocomposite materials with the subjective assessment of dentists. Pediatric dentistry and dental prophylaxis. 2020;20(2):95-100. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33925/1683-3031-2020-20-2-95-100
Views:
858
Email this article 
